WIIFY: What’s in it for you?
What’s in it for you? WIIFY is a topic I’ve blogged about before and probably will again because it’s really that important.
I can remember being in far too many presentations and thinking, “Okay, but why do I care?” or walking out of one mumbling some variation on that. To say the least, it’s very bad if your audience is left that way. It happens because presenters get so lost in their data, or in what they’re saying that they forget that the audience wants and needs to hear what it means and, especially, why they should care.
Jerry Weissman (Presenting to Win) calls it Audience Advocacy–taking the view of the audience and going beyond just presenting the information you’ve got by carefully and explicitly telling them why they should care. He makes the point strongly several times; here’s one of them:
The key building block for Audience Advocacy, and a way to focus on benefits rather than features, is to constantly ask the key question: What ’s in it for you? There are six key phrases that can trigger a WIIFY. They are designed to remind presenters about the necessity of linking every element of their presentation to a clear audience benefit, or a WIIFY.
When I coach my clients ’ presentations and I hear an idea, fact, story, or detail without a clear audience benefit, I interrupt to call out one of these WIIF Y triggers:
- “This is important’ to you because…_. ” (The presenter fills in the blank with a WIIFY)
- “What does this mean to you? ” (The presenter explains with a WIIFY)
- “Why am I telling you this? ” (The presenter explains.)
- “Who cares? ” (“You should care, because …. )
- “So what? ” (“Here ’s what … )
- “And. .. ?” (“Here’s the WIIFY.. . _ .’)
Weissman’s experience (and mine) is that this a common issue with presentations of all kinds and that even experienced presenters can easily fall into this trap. We won’t have Jerry as a coach, so we need to make a conscious effort to watch for his WIIFY triggers and ask ourselves his questions.
Remember, the goal of your presentation is to create change, and your job is to motivate the change by telling the audience what’s in it for them !
_________________
Related posts:
A presentation is not a document!
In a prior post, Why you can’t send them your slides, I wrote that your slides are there to support your presentation and not to be the presentation. Without you, they shouldn’t work. Carrying the entire presentation in the slides turns them into slideuments, which then makes them ineffective as visual aids for you, the presenter. If the slides are the presentation, why are you there at all?
Jerry Weissman, Presenting to Win, has this to say about that topic:
A presentation is a presentation and only a presentation. . . never a document. After all, Microsoft provides Word for documents and PowerPoint for presentations. And never the twain shall meet.
Be sure to distribute the handouts only after the presentation. If you distribute them before or during the presentation, your audience members will flip through them as you speak, and they won’t listen to what you have to say.
If you’re asked to provide a copy of your presentation for a conference so that the slides can be printed in book form, use PowerPoint’s Notes Page view. That way, you’ll maintain the integrity of your slides as purely presentation material.
If you’re asked to provide a copy of the presentation in advance, as so often happens, especially in the venture capital and financial sector, politely offer to provide a business plan or executive summary… as a document. And create that document with Microsoft Word, not PowerPoint.
I couldn’t agree more with Jerry on all of that.
However in the corner of the business world where I sit, that advice while correct, is often made irrelevant by management insistence on:
1) content on the slides (slideuments) and
2) distributing the slides in advance of the session. Yes, exactly what Weissman puts on his “don’t do this list.”
That road sign is the message I’d like send when that happens. Just like the drivers who see that road sign, they’re already on a dangerous path, headed in the wrong direction. Every chance I get, I suggest a change in direction, an “alternative” approach. And just telling them their way is stupid is not recommended 
— there can be a steep a price to being right here.
Alternatives
- Sometimes I can get a positive response to the idea of sending out an executive summary paper in advance instead of the slides, and it’s always worth trying.
- Occasionally, I can convince the-powers-that-be we should reduce the content on the slides, add the material to the Notes Pages and use those as a leave-behind or handout and not the slides.
- Sometimes I just do it and take the “ask forgiveness, not permission” approach.
In the end, the reality is that there’s often just no way to get it done “right” when someone else defines “right.” The odd thing is that when I do (or design) a presentation that isn’t constrained, I normally get a lot of positive feedback, ironically sometimes from the same people who insist that another approach won’t work. >sigh< But I’ll keep trying and so should you. The sad thing is that the ”bar” on presentations is so low that even small improvements can make you stand out from the crowd in a positive way. Never forget:
Presentation is the killer skill we take into the real world. It’s almost an unfair advantage.
The McKinsey Mind
Related post
Book Review: Presenting to win the art of telling your story
Book review. Presenting to win: the art of telling your story.
Presenting to win: the art of telling your story,
Jerry Weissman, ©2009, Pearson Education LTD
In a way this is going to be the shortest book review I’ve posted here, but I’m also going to follow-up with a couple more posts with some particularly good material extracted from the book.
Bottom line
This book has been around for over 2 years and has gotten hundreds of positive reviews–it doesn’t need another one. But just based my first sentence above, it should come as no surprise that I’m going to give it another one. However, the real purpose of the review is to call attention to a book that you might have missed, and I think you should fix that. So, I don’t just recommend it–I believe this belongs on your “must read” list just above Garr Reynolds’ books. From me, that’s pretty significant.
Why?
This book is fundamental when it comes to presentations. Weissman’s influence can be seen in many of the other books and authors I’ve recommended. The heart of his message is the subtitle: “. . .the art of telling your story.” The book is, itself, a great example of that message. Weissman is a storyteller who has worked in television, movies and corporate board rooms. He’s helped build compelling presentations at every level, of every format and for every type of audience. Through this book, he wants to help each and every one of us, too. Your part in the partnership is to simply read and pay attention to the book.
Just as Scott Berkun’s Confessions of a Public Speaker is best book I’ve read on that topic, so Weissman’s book is at the top of my list for presentations as a whole. Do yourself a huge favor and put this book on your to-be-read list! Then read it and your audience will thank you.
In short, highest recommendation from me, too.
What we’ve got here is a failure to communicate.
The title of this post is one of the best known movie quotes of all time. It is, of course, a line from the 1967 film Cool Hand Luke. It’s spoken at different points in the movie, the first time by Paul Newman.
I was reminded of that line while reading this post on the Harvard Business Review blog: I Don’t Understand What Anyone Is Saying Anymore by Dan Palotta.
Dan talks about an ‘epidemic’ of communications failures, identifying five types or causes. While I recommend the entire post, I was especially struck by one item. That one was “Abstractionitis” — failing to make the language specific and concrete makes you come across as vague. Being vague is a recipe for failing to get your message across, a failure to make an impact.
So if abstract is bad, what’s good? Here are some things I think you should consider:
Tell stories.
A story is concrete and the audience can relate to it. The power of story is real.
Use number-driven examples.
Find a relevant, easily-displayed example and show it. Even better, if your point can be made with a numeric data slide do so, just remember the purpose of the slide isn’t just to show the numbers, it’s about the meaning of the numbers.
Use concrete, not abstract language.
Listen carefully to the language you use in your presentation. Watch the pronouns: “they” who?! Watch for the overused and vague descriptors: just how is it ‘innovative’?! “Most people” is vague, “70% of our sample” is not.
If you want your audience to understand and remember your presentation–if you want to have an impact–you need to be clear and simple, concrete language is a way to get there. Let’s change the quote to:
What we have here is a really successful communication!
The confusing and mystical world of aspect ratios.
Aspect ratio is conceptually very simple-just take the two dimensions and express as a ratio. Old tube TV sets were, for instance, approximately 4:3 and current 
widescreen TVs are usually said to be 16:9.
Movies are a confusing mess with aspect ratios all over the place—I’ll ignore that for this post.
Common aspect ratios found “in the wild”
Aspect ratios are simple in principle, but in practice things are a bit more messy and it affects what images look like when printed or viewed on a screen.
Here are two tables of various aspect ratios that you’ll run across in various contexts:
Paper dimensions (inches) Aspect ratio
|
10 |
7.5 |
1.3333 |
4:3 |
PowerPoint’s default printable or useable (1,2) |
|
11 |
8.5 |
1.2941 |
Normal US paper size, common European sizes are 1.41 |
Photographic and television ratios
|
3 |
2 |
1.500 |
3:2 |
35mm film, 4×6 prints, digital camera option |
|
4 |
3 |
1.333 |
4:3 |
Tube TV approximates this, default for many digital cameras (3) |
|
7 |
5 |
1.400 |
5×7 print size | |
|
10 |
8 |
1.250 |
8×10 print size | |
|
12 |
8 |
1.500 |
3:2 |
“no crop” large print size |
|
16 |
9 |
1.778 |
16:9 |
widescreen TV, digital camera option |
|
16 |
10 |
1.600 |
16:10 |
many widescreen TVs are really this, some digital cameras (3) |
Notes:
1. paper printing maintains this on 8.5 x 11 paper
2. displayed, aspect ratio is maintained, fill the height, black bar the width
3. sensors in digital cameras vary in dimensions, many approximate 4:3
PowerPoint Slides
This whole post started when I got curious about PowerPoint slide dimensions. As shown above, PowerPoint will, by default, give you a slide that’s intended to be 7.5″x10″ when printed, a normal 8.5″x1 1″ page with a .5″ margin. On a screen, the margin doesn’t show, so that’s exactly a 4:3 ratio, a perfect match for older monitors and TVs. On a widescreen monitor, black bars fill the gaps on the sides so everything on the slide stays proportioned.
Pictures and cameras
Notice what that means for our discussion about using images on slides: to fit the PowerPoint slide proportions without cropping, the image will need to be 4:3, but many images aren’t. From 35mm film they’ll be 3:2 and from a digital camera they are commonly 4:3, 3:2 or 16:9. (Most digital cameras allow you to select one of those with 4:3 as a common default.) This is one reason that an image might not work full frame on the slide-fixing an aspect ratio mismatch by stretching the image out to fill out the frame will introduce distortion and that’s a definite ‘no no’.
Digital camera sidebar. The sensor in your camera has its own physical and pixel dimensions: its own aspect ratio. Of those I know about, they generally approximate a 4:3 ratio, a few are 3:2, but it’s rarely exact in any case. Interestingly, that ‘xx’ megapixel camera you’ve got probably isn’t creating images that size, especially if you select an aspect ratio other than the one that was used to rate the camera with. For instance, my current camera, a Fuji HS20EXR, is rated at 16M pixels. The max pixels stored is actually 15.9M if the 4:3 ratio is used. Set to 3:2 it stores ~14M, and at 16:9 it stores ~13M pixels. The reason is simply that the camera adapts to the chosen aspect ratio by ignoring part of the sensor to get the ratio right. If you care at all, I suggest you ignore the “wasted” pixels–if you’re going to use the images in 16:9, shooting them that way in the first place will help prevent images that can’t fill a widescreen monitor or T V. On the other hand, a 3:2 choice will give images that are proportioned right for those 4 x 6 prints and it’s also the choice that requires the least cropping to get to either of the other two ratios. I generally use 3:2, but just pick something and don’t worry about it much, just realize that no one choice is going to universally right.
Trivia note: the ‘golden ratio’
Symbolized as Phi
Since ancient times artists, architects and philosophers have been using a particular proportion ratio believing it to have special appeal, even mystical significance. Known as the golden ratio, it’s approximately 1.618 which is pretty close to 16:10. Interestingly, if you check carefully, a fair number of widescreen TVs aren’t actually 16:9, they’re 16: 10. And the pixel dimensions for the native mode for the monitor I’m using right now is 1680×1050, exactly 16:10. See? mystical significance! 
Monitors and digital projectors
What we create in the form of slides or pictures is only one half of the puzzle. No matter what it looked like natively, the other factor is what happens in the viewing process. There’s an aspect ratio there, too, and mismatches can have ‘interesting’ results.
Common screen dimensions (pixels) Aspect ratio
|
800 |
600 |
4:3 |
||
|
1024 |
768 |
4:3 |
||
|
1280 |
720 |
1.778 |
16:9 |
720 HD TV |
|
1440 |
960 |
1.600 |
16:10 |
|
|
1680 |
1050 |
1.600 |
16:10 |
|
|
1920 |
1080 |
1.778 |
16:9 |
1080 HD TV |
Back in the not-so-long-ago days of tube-type monitors, the first two entries above were common resolution modes and, not surprisingly, they’re both 4:3 aspect ratios. Now we can set our monitors to a huge array of resolutions and resulting aspect ratios. Exactly how this affects what a slide or image looks like is complicated because there are several layers of software and hardware that can influence things. It gets even worse if you’ve viewing images on a TV, yet more hardware & firmware that can ‘help’ you with how things look.
Bottom line
You don’t need to know much about all this to do a good presentation (or take great pictures). But it won’t hurt either and it just might be the clue you need to understand why that slide or the picture is either perfect, or close-but-no-cigar.
What Guy Kawasaki learned from Steve Jobs
Guy is is a venture capitalist whose “10-20-30″ rule for presentations is one I’ve mentioned before–10 minutes, 20 slides, 30-point font. That was his rule if you wanted to make a funding pitch to him. He has an interesting blog where he posted an article, What I learned from Steve Jobs.
Guy Kawasaki
His post is worth reading and he made two points that are relevant here and I liked them both:
5. Design counts.
Steve drove people nuts with his design demands—some shades of black weren’t black enough. Mere mortals think that black is black, and that a trash can is a trash can. Steve was such a perfectionist—a perfectionist Beyond: Thunderdome—and lo and behold he was right: some people care about design and many people at least sense it. Maybe not everyone, but the important ones.
6. You can’t go wrong with big graphics and big fonts.
Take a look at Steve’s slides. The font is sixty points. There’s usually one big screenshot or graphic. Look at other tech speaker’s slides—even the ones who have seen Steve in action. The font is eight points, and there are no graphics. So many people say that Steve was the world’s greatest product introduction guy… don’t you wonder why more people don’t copy his style?
Guy Kawasaki, How to change the world
The power of design
On the first point, I think Guy may be underestimating the power of design a little. I think everyone feels it when the design is right and when it’s seriously wrong. Most of us may not be able to articulate just why, but I think we sense the mediocre middle, too–”it’s okay, but it didn’t grab me”–is one phrase I’ve used, and heard from others, that I think reflects that. And presentations are no different: like everything they shouldn’t just happen by accident, they should be put together thoughtfully and with a purpose in mind, in other words, they should be designed.
The power of pictures
His second point is both reiterates and reinforces the point in my last post about using pictures in a presentation. Make them big and make them grab the audience. But while that was Steve’s style and it worked for him, that’s not a reason to copy it. Although Steve didn’t invent that style, he used it exceptionally well. But the reason to adopt it is simply because it works! And he knew it.
Anyway, thanks to Guy for an excellent post.
_____________________
Related posts here:
6 tips for using images in presentations
6 Tips for using images in presentations
Images can be an extremely effective way to communicate. The good news is that a lot of people seem to have gotten that message and are incorporating photos into their presentations. The bad news is that it’s easy to do it poorly and that can end up hurting you instead of helping. This post is my attempt to help keep you from joining the “You’re doing it wrong” crowd on this.
A case study
Here’s the setup: we’re doing a presentation where one of the points you want to make is that US national interests require that we have free access to space. You’ve got several key points to make and you want the audience to feel the importance of the issue “in the gut” –an emotional reaction. You’ve read the books, too, so you know that an effective way to get an emotional reaction is to combine a story, a picture and some reinforcing text.
But first, there’s the slide you have started with; the bullets are the points you want to make and maybe even the story you want to use.
Regular readers will know this is BAD and maybe how to fix it.
So, you wisely stripped the text off the slide and put it on the notes page or a Word document for speaker’s notes. The empty space cries out for a nice picture, so you go dig up something to put there, something “spacey.” So, here’s a picture plus a little text version:
This one doesn’t work because the image is a little small, not placed well and mainly because it has nothing to do with the point you’re making. Sure it’s “spacey” but it’s irrelevant to the point and therefore and has no power to help you make an impact.
First tip:
Tip #1: images must be big and relevant to have an impact.
So, let’s get a more relevant image and make it big.
So now we’ve got:
Better, but not good. Placement is good, it’s relevant and big. But this image started quite small and making it big makes it look fuzzy because of the heavy JPEG artifacts (enlarge it to see what I mean). We need one that’s big enough to look good-you don’t have to go full bleed (cover the slide) but it needs to be big to make a real impact.
Tip #2: use images that look good when they’re big.
Don’t settle for a low-res image you grabbed from somewhere and then make it big. Ugly things do get a reaction but not the one you want. And for heaven’s sake don’t grab a low-res sample image from a stock photo site and use it, complete with the watermark to advertise the copyright violation. (Yes, I’ve seen it done <sigh>).
Tip #3: Place the image properly and without distortion.
The last example’s image is poor, but it’s at least it’s placed pretty well and wasn’t distorted by being stretched to fit the slide. Placing the image and text is more art than science, but it may help to relook at Robin Williams’ CRAP guidelines and the post about “the rule of thirds.” The really key point to remember is that the placement must be deliberate and not look accidental.
Tip #4: Make sure the text has enough contrast to be read.
In the above examples, keeping the text off to the side ensures it will stand out. While using a full bleed image can work really well, it means the text now goes on top of the image.
We need good contrast for the text and you may have to do some extra work to be sure the text can easily be read.In this example, the image works because it naturally has a plain, dark background in the right spot.
Every image won’t be so convenient. You might be able to crop it to create a place for text, use text with a contrasting color, or do an opaque (or partially transparent fill) in the text box to create an area that gives the text enough contrast to be seen.
But sometimes you’re stuck. The best image, or the one you want to use, isn’t proportioned right, won’t fit or is too small to work full bleed. In that case, you should consider whether several smaller images will give you the right story point impact.
Tip #5: Consider using multiple images in place of one big one.
The danger is creating a busy, distracting slide, but done carefully, it can work just at least as well as one big one. At right is an example that I think works pretty well.
The stair stepped, overlapped images individually look good and thanks to the similarity in both theme and colors, I think they work well as a group. Now the size of each image is much less of an issue and there’s no need to stretch them.
In addition, this one could work well by conveying another point of the overall story by showing more than one space access method.
Tip #6: Go for an image with hits the emotions.
A good image is a lot more likely to be remembered than anything you say and any text you put on the screen. Use it to hit their emotions and the probability they remember you and your point approaches 100%.
The multiple image example is good, and it might well be the one we’d choose to use. But for me, the version of the slide I like best is this one:
The image has good resolution, it’s relevant and has a perfect spot for the text.
I’m not sure why, but this one has more emotional impact for me and it’s the one I’d use.
Clip art?
One last point on images. Clip art is not an image. Most clip art, especially the library that comes with PowerPoint, is lame and over used. It is possible to use it effectively, but it’s not easy and most presentations are much better off avoiding it.
To summarize:
Tip #1: Images must be big and relevant to have an impact.
Tip #2: Use images that look good when they’re big.
Tip #3: Place the image properly and without distortion.
Tip #4: Make sure the text has enough contrast to be read.
Tip #5: Consider using multiple images in place of one big one.
Tip #6: Go for an image that hits the emotions.
___________________________________________________
For more on this general topic, I recommend Garr Reynolds’ books, and Nancy Duarte’s book. There’s also a good post, “11 ways to use images poorly in slides” on Garr’s (www.presentationzen. com) blog that I used as a major inspiration for this post.
___________________________________________________
All photography courtesy of NASA.
Is a picture really worth a 1000 words?
One of the things that’s consistently recommended by presentation guru’s like Nancy Duarte and Garr Reynolds is the use of images, instead of lots of text.
I’ve used it and I’m a sincere believer in its effectiveness. However, for presentations in my ‘day job’ environment, rarely have I found an opportunity to embrace the PresentationZen-style with visuals containing few words and lots of pictures.
The reasons are probably are familiar to you and I see them falling into three groups:
- I’m rarely in full control of the presentation style and there’s an insistence that the slides be slideuments, i.e., all the content is on them, so that means tons of text.
- The PZ-style is so far out of the expectation that I simply can’t get there.
- I may not have a decent library of good, topic-appropriate images available, at least not for free.
Despite those obstacles, I keep up the “good fight” and focus on what I can do to improve things and not worry about what I can’t do. Even little changes help.
In the next couple posts I’m going say a bit about using images in our presentations: a little on options for finding them, a bit about what makes a picture a good one for presentation use, and some tips for effectively using them in your presentation.
And the answer is that the research says a good picture is actually worth a lot more than 1000 words, mostly because picture+text is a lot more effective than any amount of text alone.
Related post:
Visual Composition: the “rule of thirds”
Looking for the posts about scanners and scanning?
I’ve rearranged the posts on this and my other blog. The goal is to refocus each of them and reinvigorate both.
This blog will refocus on stuff related to presentations. The other one, What I think about that, will continue to include my philosophical ramblings, and other stuff that interests me but pick up the material from here on scanning and photography.
I’ve moved the photography and imaging posts over there because they’re a better fit there and I’m expanding on that material over there.
There will be a series of new posts here in the coming weeks on presentations and stuff closely related to that.
Thanks for the patience!
We’re running late, you need to cut it to…
What to do when your time is cut short?
In another part of the Toastmasters interview (see prior post) with Scott Berkun. they asked him if he encountered the situation where he showed up for, say, a 60-min presentation and the organizers asked him to cut it to 30 or even 15 minutes and, if so, how he handled it.
Hearing that I immediately thought, “whoa, that’s just like what happens when my time with some senior person suddenly gets cut in half, or worse.”
Scott’s plan
His answer was interesting, not too surprising, but good advice. He said it happened sometimes and he’d learned to plan for it and not let it get him upset. To summarize and paraphrase, his response was:
- You have to plan for it so it doesn’t destroy your ability to be effective.
- Lay out ‘N’ points that you want to make. N is 3-5 and allocate whatever time you started out with based on the priority of the points. If you’re cut short, reallocate the time on-the-fly.
- If there isn’t enough to even minimally address all ‘N’ points, allocate whatever you have to the top point or two, and list the others.
- You also need to have the 30-sec or 1 minute “elevator speech” version, get the bottom line in, offer follow-up, and quit.
That’s great advice and it got me to thinking about applying it to what happens to me or, probably, to you. So, here’s my thoughts on that to add to Scott’s advice.
Assume you won’t get the scheduled time
Personally, whenever I’m going in to brief a senior person, I start with the assumption the appointment will be half of what I’m told. If I get the full time that’s great—more discussion time or I can make them happy by giving them back a few minutes of their day. I’ve even found that when I can pull it off, just being the presenter who finished under the time is often enough to get a kudo–and get remembered!
Remember the ‘elevator speech‘
Like Scott, I’ve also learned that I’d better have the less-than-a-minute version to go with the “just leave the slides and I’ll look at it” event. That also works for the case where you only get that brief moment to talk as the person walks out on the way to whatever just preempted your time.
“Just leave the slides“
When the “just leave the slides” thing happens, what they get is my leave-behind paper, with or without the slides. Done correctly, the slides aren’t useful without the presenter, and I really don’t want to leave them. But often there’s no choice–it’s what they expect so I’ll leave them, but only with the summary sheet laying on top (which is what they really need). The more senior the person and/or the more important the brief, the more effort I’ll spend on the leave-behind package which will be a 1 -2 page summary sheet and, maybe, slides under it.
Have a plan!
However we handle it, planning for how we deal with getting cut short is crucial. It is going to happen.
Be prepared so it doesn’t destroy your ability to make an impact!
The biggest mistake speakers make
Catching up on my favorite blogs, I ran across a great item on Scott Berkun’s blog. One of his posts was about an interview he did with folks at Toastmaster’s. He has a podcast version available, so I downloaded it, listened and found it interesting.
While the entire podcast is worth your time, I’ll highlight one question they asked him and some issues raised by his answer. The question was:
What do you think is the biggest mistake that speakers make?
Scott’s answer was quick, definite and hit a major point in his book, Confessions of a Public Speaker. The essence of his response was:
The biggest mistake is a failure to practice enough.
Scott goes on to say that being under-prepared comes mainly from the fact that they think they don’t need to practice. It also comes from the fact that they’re uncomfortable enough with speaking that they can’t even make themselves practice. They’re willing to put lots of hours into the slides, but will spend no time practicing what they will say which is much more important.
“Practice? Rehearse? I don’t need that.”
I definitely hear people say those words. Heck, I’ll admit it, I’ve said them! Or we say we don’t have time, or we know the topic so well we don’t need to practice. The reality is that a lot of us know we should, but we’re not willing to do it and I suspect that’s mostly out of fear and partly out of ignorance. We think we’ll feel silly practicing and we’re mostly ignorant of the consequences, all of them bad.
Being under-prepared leads to bad things
- Putting lots of text on the slides.
This is a common and very bad consequence, one I see all too often. I suspect they’re thinking that if all the words are on the slides, they won’t forget anything and that they can read them. So they think they don’t need to practice. Thus, we get another presenter with too many words on the slides, or worse, the presenter who reads the slides to the audience.
- Being tied to a script and/or the lectern.
Even when the slides aren’t one, too many presenters write a script and read it. There are times when a script is required and doing a good presentation from a script is particularly difficult. I find it tough to convince people of it, but the reality is that it’s harder, not easier, to do a good presentation from a script.
- We’re more nervous, more likely to make mistakes.
If the first time you talk through the presentation is “live,” don’t be surprised if it doesn’t go well. It’s rare that anyone gets the topic flow right the first time, much less getting exactly the right words for each point they want to make. The only way to smooth it out is to practice it.
Listening to Scott talk was interesting and entertaining. Here’s a guy that knows public speaking through more experience than any of us is likely to ever acquire. After his comments and these notes, you can still avoid practicing the presentation, but I don’t think you can still be ignorant of the bad effects!
Bottom line
If the presentation is at all important, invest some time to practice. It will be worth it.
____________________
For more on this topic, I highly recommend Berkun’s book.
Book review: “Start with Why” by Simon Sinek
Start with Why
Simon Sinek, (c)2010, Portfolio Press
Simon Sinek
When I first heard Simon talk about the idea which is the basis for this book, I was entertained but not very impressed. The idea seemed simplistic and obvious. But some part of my brain connected with it and couldn’t let go of it.
Over the course of the next few days I started seeing examples of the power in his idea, and I found myself using his ideas in various pieces of my life.
I changed my mind—yes, his idea is simple, but it is not simplistic. I ended up buying both the idea and his book. His insight is one I think you should know about—and that might mean reading the book.
The TED Video
First, independent of whether you buy the book or not, I highly recommend that you watch his talk which appears on TED.com (video player embedded below). If the player here doesn’t work for you, here’s the link.
Simon’s insight
Watching the video will show you Sinek’s core insight. It won’t substitute for the video or the book, but here’s the key point Sinek is making:
People don’t buy what you do, they buy why you do it.
What Simon’s saying that if you want to lead people, inspire people, create brand loyalty or just be successful in a presentation, you have to start with answering why they should they care. Why you are in business. Why you care about the cause you want them to sign up for. Leaders, individuals and companies get lost in explaining what they do or what they want you to do and the how to do it—mistakenly believing that will get the results they want. His insight derived from realizing that success across many domains had a common thread—a focus on Why and not what or how.
Regardless of your reaction right now to that idea or thought, if you haven’t watched the video please do so. After that, suspend judgment for a bit and let the ideas sink in for awhile. Then, maybe, you’ll be like me and buy the book and the idea.
Why it matters to presenters.
I’ve already blogged a couple times mentioning the importance of the “what’s in it for them?” approach. Simon’s insight simply hammers this point even harder and explains the devastating impact of failing to explain to the audience why you care about the topic and why they should, too. His insight says that far more than the facts and figures, what inspires them to act is whether they buy into your answer to this: why should I care?
The book–bottom line
The book is good, well written, well documented and has a lot of material that expands on that insight. It’s not a difficult read and it may help you “get it,” but the idea is so simple that the 18 min TED video may be all you need. More importantly, the video will do a better job than any review with helping you decide if you need to read it. But I won’t be surprised if your reaction parallels mine with an initial ‘so what?’ followed later by ‘hmmmm’ and still later ‘this guy’s onto something interesting here’. When that happens, you know you want the book.
The book—what I liked
So, am I saying that Simon’s book is redundant after the video? Not really. His talk does an excellent job, however, of covering the heart of his idea so there’s a lot of overlap—in fact, parts of the book are used nearly word-for-word as a script. But the book takes his ideas and expands on them, showing just how it applies across a surprisingly wide spectrum of domains. He draws on some academic research for support and illustrates the concepts with well explained examples. But this isn’t a scholarly work, it’s an easy read and the concepts aren’t difficult—you may not agree with his point, but you’ll understand it. I particularly liked his discussion of how companies (and individuals) think they’re telling you why you should buy their product/idea/etc, but in reality they’ve confused ‘what’ and ‘how’ with ‘why’. Even if it works, that’s quite different from telling you why you should care about them or their product.
The book—what I didn’t like
I got the feeling that either Simon or his publisher decided this book needed to be thicker than the first draft turned out. Some of seemed ‘tacked on’ and sometimes there are more words than I needed to see his point. I also think he has an over reliance on Apple corporation as an example, though to his credit, Apple doesn’t get used 100% used as a positive example. But frankly, those points don’t seriously detract from a good book. Simon’s got something worthwhile to say and he says it well.
Recommended
Yes, this review is a little strange—it’s more about Simon’s idea than his book. I will strongly recommend Sinek’s idea for your consideration. The book’s good, but it’s the idea that’s important.
Watch the video, read the book or both.
Presentation tip: Disappearing slides
You might know this little trick for PowerPoint, but I’m always surprised how many don’t, so I’ll post it here in case you missed it.
_______________________________________________________
Whenever PowerPoint is running in full screen, slide show mode:
Hit the B key on the keyboard.
That makes the screen black.
or
Hit the W key on the keyboard.
That makes the screen white.
Either way, the next keypress brings the screen right back where it was.
_______________________________________________________
That little trick is a lot more useful than you might think.
In an earlier post here I recounted research from Brain Rules (Medina) showing that human brains (presumably that includes most of your audience) can’t read text on the screen and listen to you at the same time. But if there’s text on the screen lots of people feel compelled to read it, so they’re not listening to you.
This little trick is the ‘how’ for getting that text out of sight,
blank the screen at any point where you need the audience’s attention fully on you.
Remember that you are the presentation. The visuals are there to help you and when they’re not helping, get them off the screen so they can’t be a distraction.
